H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sesil Karatantcheva vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 1-1
Sesil Karatantcheva and Casey Dellacqua are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on grass, while Sesil Karatantcheva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2015 Nottingham third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2015* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Casey Dellacqua | 7-5 6-3 | Sesil Karatantcheva | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2010* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sesil Karatantcheva | 6-2 0-6 7-6(1) | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sesil Karatantcheva | #1,329 | #35 | 919 | 1,727 | 50 | 75 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sesil Karatantcheva | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2004 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #133 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #140 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |