H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Shahar Peer holds a 1–0 lead over Agnes Szavay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2009 US Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | 6-2 6-2 | Agnes Szavay | Match data | Sep 2, 2009* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,969 | 269 | 206 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,837 | 116 | 92 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shahar Peer | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,816 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #28 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2008 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,788 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,888 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,659 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,559 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Shahar Peer | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 2006 | 22 | 14 | 36 | 61.1% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2008 | 5 | 16 | 21 | 23.8% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 20 | 2007 | 29 | 14 | 43 | 67.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2008 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 2009 | 28 | 14 | 42 | 66.7% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 32 | 14 | 46 | 69.6% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 191 | 136 | 327 | 58.4% | 62 | 48 | 110 | 56.4% | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | 43 | 51 | 94 | 45.7% | 62 | 31 | 93 | 66.7% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 370/469 of Shahar Peer's and 164/196 of Agnes Szavay's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Shahar Peer | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2005 | 5/42 | 1.4 | 4.4 | 55.4% | 58.1% | 41.3% | 58.7% | 48.3% | 50.7% | 44.8% | 2007 | 25/39 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 57.7% | 69.6% | 49.8% | 52.7% | 43.3% | 60.9% | 46.4% |
| 19 | 2006 | 30/58 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 64.3% | 60.8% | 44.2% | 51.0% | 52.2% | 54.9% | 47.0% | 2008 | 44/51 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 60.2% | 64.6% | 44.6% | 54.0% | 47.7% | 56.2% | 45.4% |
| 20 | 2007 | 58/60 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 66.3% | 63.0% | 48.5% | 53.0% | 52.1% | 58.4% | 47.4% | 2009 | 38/44 | 1.7 | 4.8 | 63.0% | 59.6% | 44.4% | 47.3% | 43.7% | 54.0% | 45.5% |
| 21 | 2008 | 37/46 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 68.0% | 61.7% | 44.5% | 47.6% | 45.8% | 56.2% | 46.1% | 2010 | 47/49 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 68.3% | 62.5% | 46.0% | 49.4% | 52.7% | 57.3% | 48.0% |
| 22 | 2009 | 48/57 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 65.2% | 61.3% | 47.9% | 52.4% | 48.8% | 56.5% | 47.1% | 2011 | 9/10 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 66.1% | 61.2% | 42.0% | 42.4% | 44.7% | 54.3% | 45.3% |
| 23 | 2010 | 63/68 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 64.4% | 64.7% | 46.9% | 55.5% | 49.4% | 58.4% | 45.9% | 2012 | 1/3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 58.1% | 62.8% | 45.2% | 44.4% | 26.7% | 55.4% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2011 | 41/44 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 63.5% | 60.5% | 43.0% | 50.2% | 46.0% | 54.1% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 35/38 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 63.2% | 59.5% | 42.5% | 41.1% | 48.8% | 53.4% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 23/24 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 64.9% | 57.9% | 42.9% | 54.5% | 48.3% | 52.4% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 26/28 | 0.8 | 4.7 | 62.5% | 59.2% | 39.5% | 44.3% | 48.8% | 51.9% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 4/4 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 63.6% | 52.0% | 42.6% | 26.5% | 60.4% | 48.4% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 370/475 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 64.7% | 61.4% | 45.1% | 50.5% | 49.2% | 55.7% | 45.8% | — | 164/208 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 63.1% | 63.4% | 45.6% | 50.2% | 47.2% | 56.6% | 46.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Shahar Peer | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1496 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +62 | — | 50.0% | -0.35 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.52 |
| 17 | 2004 | 1510 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 53.8% | -0.08 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.42 | 2006 | 1482 | 92.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | 37.5% | -1.12 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.25 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1636 | 124.9 | -1.60 | +0.29 | 0.910 | 48.0% | -10 | -58 | -78 | 51.0% | -0.03 | 10–8 (56%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.4 | -0.40 | 2007 | 1817 | 139.5 | +3.34 | +1.55 | 1.188 | 53.7% | -85 | -83 | — | 75.3% | +1.84 | 3–2 (60%) | 5–3 (63%) | 104.5 | +2.78 |
| 19 | 2006 | 1829 | 146.6 | -0.62 | +1.81 | 1.042 | 50.8% | -41 | -7 | -266 | 61.9% | +1.04 | 11–7 (61%) | 9–9 (50%) | 104.4 | +0.31 | 2008 | 1659 | 126.3 | +0.68 | +0.73 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -68 | +101 | -7 | 50.4% | +0.04 | 9–10 (47%) | 8–6 (57%) | 98.5 | +2.79 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1833 | 153.0 | +2.29 | +3.68 | 1.138 | 52.8% | +7 | +25 | -154 | 63.6% | +0.84 | 6–8 (43%) | 9–4 (69%) | 101.8 | +0.52 | 2009 | 1710 | 134.5 | -0.66 | +1.84 | 0.988 | 49.6% | -134 | +198 | — | 49.5% | -0.23 | 8–9 (47%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.3 | -0.22 |
| 21 | 2008 | 1710 | 132.5 | +0.71 | +1.58 | 1.054 | 51.1% | +42 | +32 | 0 | 52.0% | +0.17 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.3 | 0.00 | 2010 | 1786 | 142.5 | +0.86 | +3.56 | 1.125 | 52.6% | -81 | +154 | -165 | 60.0% | +0.90 | 12–8 (60%) | 2–7 (22%) | 99.3 | +0.13 |
| 22 | 2009 | 1789 | 138.4 | +1.20 | +2.73 | 1.084 | 52.0% | +30 | -85 | — | 60.5% | +0.76 | 9–4 (69%) | 8–2 (80%) | 108.3 | -0.03 | 2011 | 1721 | 117.3 | -0.84 | +0.06 | 0.990 | 49.6% | -18 | +145 | — | 50.0% | -0.05 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | +0.02 |
| 23 | 2010 | 1888 | 152.7 | +2.81 | +2.91 | 1.104 | 52.2% | -10 | -19 | -200 | 62.7% | +0.97 | 14–4 (78%) | 5–6 (45%) | 106.9 | -0.29 | 2012 | 1659 | 98.0 | -1.90 | -1.71 | 0.969 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.42 |
| 24 | 2011 | 1708 | 130.0 | -0.93 | -0.58 | 0.936 | 48.7% | +54 | +67 | — | 49.5% | -0.07 | 9–4 (69%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.2 | +1.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1586 | 125.7 | -1.37 | +0.83 | 0.959 | 49.0% | +71 | +119 | +14 | 41.3% | -0.51 | 1–9 (10%) | 2–5 (29%) | 86.0 | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 1559 | 108.2 | -2.36 | -0.25 | 0.955 | 49.0% | +34 | +89 | — | 41.8% | -0.56 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +1.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 1539 | 108.9 | -3.44 | +0.83 | 0.938 | 48.5% | +5 | +83 | +40 | 40.3% | -0.91 | 4–7 (36%) | 4–0 (100%) | 99.7 | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 1527 | 104.5 | -1.91 | -2.82 | 0.718 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.22 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 1478 | 88.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1969 | 140.8 | +0.35 | +1.76 | 1.032 | 50.7% | +14 | +16 | -88 | 54.5% | +0.32 | 76–60 (56%) | 51–41 (55%) | 103.9 | +0.51 | — | 1838 | 136.4 | +0.73 | +1.87 | 1.067 | 51.4% | -89 | +96 | -75 | 56.0% | +0.42 | 35–34 (51%) | 20–20 (50%) | 99.2 | +3.25 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 7 | 3 | 10 | Feb 25, 2011 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 24, 2011 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 3 | 4 | 7 | Oct 9, 2014 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jun 25, 2014 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 29, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 2, 2010 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 5, 2011 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 8, 2011 | H2H |
| Tathiana Garbin | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 10, 2009 | H2H |
| Olga Govortsova | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 24, 2011 | H2H |