H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shahar Peer vs Alberta Brianti H2H: 2-0
Shahar Peer holds a 2–0 lead over Alberta Brianti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2011 Washington quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 | Washington | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Shahar Peer | 6-1 6-2 | Alberta Brianti | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Shahar Peer | 6-3 6-4 | Alberta Brianti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Alberta Brianti | #908 | #55 | 1,066 | 1,646 | 53 | 93 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shahar Peer | Alberta Brianti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #154 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,367 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #91 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #70 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |