H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shahar Peer vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 3-4

Anna Chakvetadze holds a 4–3 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 4–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2012 Hobart quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 1-0 RET.

ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 14, 2012* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Shahar Peer #37 4-6 6-4 1-0 (ret.) Anna Chakvetadze #234 Match data
Mar 12, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Shahar Peer #49 6-2 6-4 Anna Chakvetadze #24 Match data
Jul 18, 2008* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #8 6-3 6-4 Shahar Peer #25 Match data
Sep 6, 2007* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Anna Chakvetadze #6 6-4 6-1 Shahar Peer #19 Match data
Mar 9, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Shahar Peer #16 6-4 7-6(2) Anna Chakvetadze #11 Match data
Aug 19, 2006* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Anna Chakvetadze #31 7-6(3) 7-5 Shahar Peer #25 Match data
Mar 22, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #36 6-1 6-2 Shahar Peer #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,067 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shahar Peer Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,526 0 0
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,716 0 0
19 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,936 0 2
20 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,984 0 6
21 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,721 0 7
22 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,711 0 7
23 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,715 0 8
24 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,641 0 8
25 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,557 0 8
26 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5