H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shahar Peer vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 1-0

Shahar Peer holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2013 Budapest round of 16 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anna Tatishvili
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shahar Peer #162 6-1 6-1 Anna Tatishvili #101 Match data Jul 12, 2013* R16 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Anna Tatishvili #1,071 #50 1,210 1,615 44 93 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shahar Peer Anna Tatishvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1156 1,485 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #302 1,502 0 0
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #285 1,456 0 0
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #160 1,444 0 0
19 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3 2009 0–2 0.0% #177 1,423 0 0
20 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3 2010 4–6 40.0% #134 1,467 0 0
21 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3 2011 7–14 33.3% #89 1,493 0 0
22 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5 2012 16–18 47.1% #51 1,602 0 0
23 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5 2013 4–18 18.2% #127 1,492 0 0
24 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5 2014 0–6 0.0% #146 1,438 0 0
25 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5 2015 7–8 46.7% #101 1,507 0 0
26 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5 2016 3–8 27.3% #200 1,464 0 0
27 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5 2017 0–2 0.0% #516 1,445 0 0
28 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #998 1,436 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shahar Peer Anna Tatishvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2004 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 8 7 15 53.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 0 10 10 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 5 7 12 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
26 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — 19 51 70 27.1% 20 32 52 38.5% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 370/469 of Shahar Peer's and 120/136 of Anna Tatishvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shahar Peer Anna Tatishvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 5/5 0.2 7.2 60.9% 52.1% 37.1% 52.3% 41.0% 46.6% 43.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/6 1.8 4.3 63.6% 55.3% 44.7% 41.1% 36.9% 51.3% 41.6%
18 2005 5/42 1.4 4.4 55.4% 58.1% 41.3% 58.7% 48.3% 50.7% 44.8% 2008 1/1 2.0 10.0 58.4% 53.8% 35.1% 40.0% 66.7% 46.1% 45.7%
19 2006 30/58 1.1 3.6 64.3% 60.8% 44.2% 51.0% 52.2% 54.9% 47.0% 2009 2/2 1.5 5.5 65.3% 52.8% 35.6% 45.0% 41.5% 46.4% 44.0%
20 2007 58/60 1.3 2.8 66.3% 63.0% 48.5% 53.0% 52.1% 58.4% 47.4% 2010 10/10 0.4 4.5 72.1% 54.8% 41.7% 48.4% 43.7% 51.0% 42.6%
21 2008 37/46 1.1 2.6 68.0% 61.7% 44.5% 47.6% 45.8% 56.2% 46.1% 2011 21/21 0.8 3.9 71.3% 54.6% 40.0% 36.7% 46.6% 50.4% 44.2%
22 2009 48/57 1.5 2.1 65.2% 61.3% 47.9% 52.4% 48.8% 56.5% 47.1% 2012 31/34 1.6 4.4 67.1% 57.4% 43.7% 48.3% 51.0% 52.5% 43.6%
23 2010 63/68 1.5 3.1 64.4% 64.7% 46.9% 55.5% 49.4% 58.4% 45.9% 2013 18/22 0.9 4.4 63.5% 48.7% 39.9% 44.9% 44.2% 45.5% 40.5%
24 2011 41/44 1.2 3.0 63.5% 60.5% 43.0% 50.2% 46.0% 54.1% 42.9% 2014 5/6 1.0 5.4 61.0% 55.4% 33.5% 45.4% 28.9% 47.3% 38.0%
25 2012 35/38 1.2 3.5 63.2% 59.5% 42.5% 41.1% 48.8% 53.4% 44.7% 2015 9/15 1.2 1.8 69.7% 59.4% 47.1% 49.3% 53.9% 56.0% 43.1%
26 2013 23/24 0.6 3.2 64.9% 57.9% 42.9% 54.5% 48.3% 52.4% 45.5% 2016 11/11 1.7 5.0 64.2% 61.3% 45.2% 54.1% 42.5% 54.8% 39.2%
27 2014 26/28 0.8 4.7 62.5% 59.2% 39.5% 44.3% 48.8% 51.9% 45.1% 2017 2/2 0.5 5.5 59.2% 55.0% 28.8% 41.7% 23.1% 43.1% 29.0%
28 2015 4/4 0.8 3.3 63.6% 52.0% 42.6% 26.5% 60.4% 48.4% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 58.5% 33.3% 17.6% 14.3% 20.0% 26.8% 38.5%
Career — 370/475 1.2 3.1 64.7% 61.4% 45.1% 50.5% 49.2% 55.7% 45.8% — 120/137 1.1 4.4 66.7% 55.2% 41.4% 45.7% 45.5% 50.4% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shahar Peer Anna Tatishvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1486 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.05
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1503 107.1 -1.97 -1.16 0.819 45.5% +3 — — 33.3% -1.67 2–0 2–0 — -0.07
17 2004 1510 102.5 — — — — +18 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 — — +0.42 2007 1457 98.2 -1.65 -2.40 0.853 46.6% +30 — — 26.7% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.24
18 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40 2008 1445 99.5 +0.37 -0.11 0.846 45.9% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.07
19 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31 2009 1423 97.5 -2.50 -0.92 0.822 45.3% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.08
20 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52 2010 1467 106.2 -2.74 -1.42 0.870 46.8% -3 +70 — 37.5% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.24
21 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00 2011 1493 109.7 -3.47 +0.38 0.892 47.4% -31 +21 +123 37.3% -0.92 4–5 (44%) 2–0 — -0.54
22 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 — 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03 2012 1603 121.9 -2.57 -0.58 0.917 48.2% -29 -66 +25 48.6% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.7 +1.20
23 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29 2013 1492 109.8 -6.30 -0.93 0.743 43.1% -24 +61 — 27.5% -1.71 3–6 (33%) 0–6 (0%) 95.0 -1.42
24 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 — 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40 2014 1438 99.1 -2.75 -1.09 0.721 41.8% -11 — — 0.0% -3.17 — 0–1 — -0.11
25 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53 2015 1507 120.0 -1.39 +0.32 0.979 49.8% -24 +52 — 48.3% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.48
26 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 — 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.54 2016 1465 99.1 -1.19 -1.79 0.868 47.1% -43 +61 +114 40.0% -1.12 1–4 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 +0.73
27 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24 2017 1445 96.1 -2.88 -0.25 0.510 37.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
28 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1478 88.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1436 97.6 -1.44 +0.62 0.526 33.3% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.08
Career — 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51 — 1615 112.7 -3.01 -0.67 0.850 46.4% -21 +16 +80 36.5% -1.09 21–29 (42%) 15–17 (47%) 100.2 +0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.