H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shahar Peer vs Melinda Czink H2H: 3-0

Shahar Peer holds a 3–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2008 Stanford round of 32 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shahar Peer #25 7-5 6-0 Melinda Czink #126 Match data Jul 17, 2008* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Shahar Peer #18 6-0 3-6 6-2 Melinda Czink #149 Match data Feb 29, 2008* R16 Memphis Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shahar Peer #16 7-6(3) 6-4 Melinda Czink #129 Match data Oct 11, 2007* R32 Bangkok Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shahar Peer Melinda Czink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0
22 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0
23 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0
24 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0
25 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0
26 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1
28 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shahar Peer Melinda Czink
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2004 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 370/469 of Shahar Peer's and 143/226 of Melinda Czink's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shahar Peer Melinda Czink
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 5/42 1.4 4.4 55.4% 58.1% 41.3% 58.7% 48.3% 50.7% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 30/58 1.1 3.6 64.3% 60.8% 44.2% 51.0% 52.2% 54.9% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 58/60 1.3 2.8 66.3% 63.0% 48.5% 53.0% 52.1% 58.4% 47.4% 2003 3/7 1.0 1.7 65.3% 58.7% 40.7% 45.8% 31.9% 52.1% 41.9%
21 2008 37/46 1.1 2.6 68.0% 61.7% 44.5% 47.6% 45.8% 56.2% 46.1% 2004 4/18 1.0 2.0 70.2% 54.4% 42.8% 39.0% 56.8% 50.8% 44.0%
22 2009 48/57 1.5 2.1 65.2% 61.3% 47.9% 52.4% 48.8% 56.5% 47.1% 2005 1/21 1.0 4.0 71.4% 54.3% 28.6% 50.0% 100.0% 46.9% 29.6%
23 2010 63/68 1.5 3.1 64.4% 64.7% 46.9% 55.5% 49.4% 58.4% 45.9% 2006 6/32 2.0 3.3 71.5% 59.4% 46.2% 60.2% 50.6% 55.2% 42.5%
24 2011 41/44 1.2 3.0 63.5% 60.5% 43.0% 50.2% 46.0% 54.1% 42.9% 2007 4/12 1.0 4.5 62.6% 62.1% 45.1% 40.4% 36.1% 55.8% 36.3%
25 2012 35/38 1.2 3.5 63.2% 59.5% 42.5% 41.1% 48.8% 53.4% 44.7% 2008 16/21 2.8 5.2 62.8% 66.0% 42.4% 50.4% 55.5% 57.1% 39.5%
26 2013 23/24 0.6 3.2 64.9% 57.9% 42.9% 54.5% 48.3% 52.4% 45.5% 2009 44/50 3.5 5.5 61.7% 64.9% 47.8% 49.9% 51.8% 58.1% 42.7%
27 2014 26/28 0.8 4.7 62.5% 59.2% 39.5% 44.3% 48.8% 51.9% 45.1% 2010 19/19 2.8 6.3 61.0% 61.3% 39.9% 46.1% 28.6% 52.9% 38.0%
28 2015 4/4 0.8 3.3 63.6% 52.0% 42.6% 26.5% 60.4% 48.4% 37.1% 2011 9/9 2.3 6.8 61.8% 61.7% 47.4% 43.6% 45.3% 56.0% 40.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 25/25 2.7 4.2 59.6% 64.5% 48.9% 53.6% 46.3% 58.1% 39.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 12/12 3.3 4.7 62.4% 63.3% 40.1% 50.6% 43.7% 54.8% 36.9%
Career — 370/475 1.2 3.1 64.7% 61.4% 45.1% 50.5% 49.2% 55.7% 45.8% — 143/226 2.8 5.0 62.2% 63.3% 45.1% 49.5% 46.6% 56.3% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shahar Peer Melinda Czink
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2004 1510 102.5 — — — — +18 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33
21 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
22 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 — 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54
23 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02
24 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 — 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11
25 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10
26 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 — 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.54 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55
27 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52
28 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 — -0.28 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11
29 2016 1478 88.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51
Career — 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51 — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.