H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Shilin Xu vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-1
Rebecca Peterson holds a 1–0 lead over Shilin Xu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2016 Guangzhou third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2016* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Rebecca Peterson | 6-3 6-1 | Shilin Xu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shilin Xu | #500 | #190 | 305 | 1,500 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,863 | 79 | 93 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shilin Xu | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #277 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |