H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shinobu Asagoe vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 0-2
Kveta Peschke holds a 2–0 lead over Shinobu Asagoe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kveta Peschke leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2002 Australian Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Shinobu Asagoe | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2001* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Shinobu Asagoe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinobu Asagoe | #215 | #21 | 1,254 | 1,769 | 95 | 119 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shinobu Asagoe | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #72 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #45 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |