H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 4-4

Shuai Peng and Agnieszka Radwanska are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2017 New Haven quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.

CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 2017* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #10 7-5 6-3 Shuai Peng #23 Match data
Mar 13, 2017* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Shuai Peng #49 6-4 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #6 Match data
Oct 15, 2016* Tianjin WTA 250 QF Hard Shuai Peng #182 (w/o) Agnieszka Radwanska #3 Match data
Aug 28, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Shuai Peng #39 6-3 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #5 Match data
Jan 26, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #14 7-5 3-6 7-5 Shuai Peng #54 Match data
Sep 2, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Shuai Peng #61 2-6 6-1 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #10 Match data
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Agnieszka Radwanska #14 6-2 6-7(6) 9-7 Shuai Peng #36 Match data
Mar 13, 2008* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #19 6-3 3-6 6-3 Shuai Peng #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2