H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 2-3

Maria Kirilenko holds a 3–2 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2014 Wimbledon second round 6-0 6-3.

CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Shuai Peng #61 6-0 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #109 Match data
Jan 18, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Maria Kirilenko #15 7-5 6-2 Shuai Peng #32 Match data
Jul 4, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Maria Kirilenko #19 6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 Shuai Peng #34 Match data
Sep 22, 2006* Beijing WTA 500 R16 Hard Shuai Peng #60 5-7 6-4 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #25 Match data
Feb 4, 2005* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Maria Kirilenko #94 6-3 6-2 Shuai Peng #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2