H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Na Li H2H: 1-5

Na Li holds a 5–1 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Shenzhen final 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng

CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H

1 – 5

6 main draw meetings

Na Li

CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Jan 5, 2014*	Shenzhen	WTA 250	F	Hard	Na Li #3	6-4 7-5	Shuai Peng #42	Match data
Jan 5, 2013*	Shenzhen	WTA 250	SF	Hard	Na Li #7	6-4 6-0	Shuai Peng #40	Match data
Oct 5, 2012*	Beijing	WTA 1000	R16	Hard	Na Li #8	4-6 6-2 7-6(3)	Shuai Peng #49	Match data
Aug 8, 2011	Toronto	WTA 1000	R32	Hard	Na Li #6	(w/o)	Shuai Peng #17	Match data
Mar 9, 2011*	Indian Wells	WTA 1000	R64	Hard	Shuai Peng #36	4-6 6-3 6-3	Na Li #7	Match data
Apr 30, 2009*	Stuttgart	WTA 500	R32	Clay	Na Li #30	6-2 6-3	Shuai Peng #33	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Shuai Peng	#820	#14	2,825	1,890	300	258	53.8%	0	0	0	0	2	2
Na Li	#9	#2	7,585	2,124	334	155	68.3%	2	1	0	2	4	9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Shuai Peng							Na Li
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	2001	0–1	0.0%	#518	1,493	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	2002	0–1	0.0%	#366	1,484	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	2003	0–2	0.0%	#221	1,455	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	2004	5–4	55.6%	#80	1,516	0	0	2000	1–2	33.3%	#136	1,499	0	0
19	2005	20–16	55.6%	#36	1,678	0	0	2001	0–1	0.0%	#302	1,483	0	0
20	2006	18–17	51.4%	#55	1,727	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	2007	19–17	52.8%	#45	1,737	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2008	24–22	52.2%	#40	1,706	0	0	2004	6–1	85.7%	#78	1,601	0	1
23	2009	23–22	51.1%	#46	1,770	0	0	2005	23–14	62.2%	#56	1,711	0	1
24	2010	15–13	53.6%	#72	1,742	0	0	2006	36–22	62.1%	#21	1,801	0	1
25	2011	48–23	67.6%	#17	1,817	0	0	2007	22–12	64.7%	#29	1,814	0	1
26	2012	21–22	48.8%	#40	1,699	0	0	2008	24–12	66.7%	#23	1,843	0	2
27	2013	18–18	50.0%	#42	1,657	0	0	2009	35–17	67.3%	#15	1,914	0	2
28	2014	28–22	56.0%	#21	1,743	0	0	2010	36–20	64.3%	#11	1,844	0	3
29	2015	6–7	46.2%	#137	1,698	0	0	2011	33–17	66.0%	#5	1,868	1	5
30	2016	8–10	44.4%	#84	1,711	0	1	2012	43–16	72.9%	#7	2,016	1	6
31	2017	37–21	63.8%	#27	1,815	0	2	2013	46–14	76.7%	#3	2,077	1	7
32	2018	1–8	11.1%	#125	1,741	0	2	2014	29–7	80.6%	#9	2,031	2	9
33	2019	7–9	43.8%	#109	1,679	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2020	2–3	40.0%	#117	1,636	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—