H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 2-4

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 4–2 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2013 US Open second round 6-1 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #29 6-1 4-6 6-4 Shuai Peng #37 Match data
Mar 24, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Shuai Peng #32 6-3 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #15 Match data
Jan 7, 2011* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Shuai Peng #72 2-6 6-4 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #27 Match data
Mar 24, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 6-2 3-6 6-4 Shuai Peng #56 Match data
Jan 15, 2009* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 3-6 6-1 6-3 Shuai Peng #39 Match data
Sep 23, 2006* Beijing WTA 500 SF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 6-0 6-2 Shuai Peng #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 — — — — — — — 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18