H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 0-1
Barbora Strycova holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2011 Quebec City third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2011* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbora Strycova | 6-4 6-2 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Barbora Strycova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |