H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Shuai Zhang vs Donna Vekic H2H: 3-3

Shuai Zhang and Donna Vekic are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Shuai Zhang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2023 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Donna Vekic
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Vekic #21 6-2 6-3 Shuai Zhang #38 Match data Jul 5, 2023* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Donna Vekic #85 6-2 6-4 Shuai Zhang #26 Match data Sep 30, 2022* R16 Tallinn WTA 250 Hard
Shuai Zhang #26 7-5 5-7 6-1 Donna Vekic #45 Match data Sep 26, 2017* R64 Wuhan Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Shuai Zhang #34 7-5 6-4 Donna Vekic #75 Match data May 30, 2017* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Shuai Zhang #64 6-2 6-0 Donna Vekic #84 Match data Feb 12, 2015* R32 Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Donna Vekic #95 1-6 6-3 6-4 Shuai Zhang #45 Match data Apr 19, 2014* SF Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Donna Vekic #39 #17 2,458 1,933 243 238 50.5% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Zhang Donna Vekic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0
17 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0
18 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,552 0 1
19 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1
20 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1
21 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2
22 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0 2018 31–24 56.4% #34 1,781 0 2
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,770 0 2
24 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,695 0 2
25 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,760 0 3
26 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3
27 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,778 0 4
28 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,896 0 4
29 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,741 0 4
30 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2 2026 12–12 50.0% #39 1,759 0 5
31 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,697 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Zhang Donna Vekic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6%
23 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
28 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3%
29 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2026 2 7 9 22.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
31 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6% — 149 161 310 48.1% 39 42 81 48.1% 55 35 90 61.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 497/529 of Shuai Zhang's and 444/483 of Donna Vekic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Zhang Donna Vekic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 4/5 4.3 2.3 52.3% 70.6% 53.9% 25.0% 53.1% 62.9% 44.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 24/24 2.7 2.8 56.0% 65.9% 50.9% 40.1% 46.9% 58.9% 44.8%
18 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7% 2014 30/30 3.7 4.4 53.3% 66.6% 40.9% 47.3% 54.0% 54.4% 42.1%
19 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5% 2015 14/20 3.9 5.6 57.9% 63.2% 43.0% 40.1% 45.4% 54.1% 38.4%
20 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7% 2016 20/20 2.9 6.3 49.8% 64.6% 39.8% 54.2% 52.4% 52.2% 40.3%
21 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2% 2017 37/37 3.9 5.3 56.0% 65.0% 45.6% 57.2% 47.8% 56.3% 40.4%
22 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4% 2018 49/55 3.1 4.7 55.1% 67.5% 44.7% 52.0% 48.1% 57.3% 45.4%
23 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2% 2019 59/59 3.6 4.3 57.1% 69.9% 47.5% 48.2% 52.0% 60.4% 45.0%
24 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0% 2020 19/19 2.9 4.4 58.0% 65.5% 43.7% 43.4% 45.6% 56.9% 42.5%
25 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0% 2021 28/31 4.6 5.5 57.2% 70.4% 45.8% 53.6% 44.5% 59.7% 43.1%
26 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9% 2022 25/25 3.8 5.3 56.6% 68.9% 45.0% 52.3% 57.0% 58.5% 41.5%
27 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5% 2023 46/47 4.0 5.4 56.0% 67.6% 44.2% 52.8% 51.8% 57.4% 43.6%
28 2017 46/47 3.0 2.8 63.5% 65.3% 44.1% 53.1% 50.1% 57.6% 44.3% 2024 44/51 4.8 4.8 57.2% 71.9% 45.2% 49.1% 46.5% 60.4% 44.1%
29 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7% 2025 22/35 3.0 5.8 53.4% 64.6% 39.6% 51.8% 43.1% 53.0% 41.1%
30 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9% 2026 23/25 3.9 4.6 58.7% 67.5% 44.4% 54.4% 38.9% 58.1% 41.2%
31 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.0% 47.6% 54.7% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 497/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.8% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2% — 444/483 3.7 4.8 55.9% 67.7% 44.8% 50.1% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Zhang Donna Vekic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 — +0.32
17 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.09
18 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21 2014 1552 122.1 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +17 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) — -0.23
19 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06 2015 1606 102.7 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -21 -76 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — — +0.62
20 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05 2016 1563 111.8 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -99 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.76
21 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51 2017 1670 128.8 -0.07 -1.45 0.923 48.5% -42 -177 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.63
22 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.05 2018 1782 137.0 +0.35 +2.36 1.063 51.2% -52 -181 -7 57.0% +0.37 4–11 (27%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.05
23 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17 2019 1771 150.5 +3.02 +2.45 1.137 52.4% -24 -62 +25 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) — +1.18
24 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48 2020 1696 131.1 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +28 -43 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.62
25 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.61 2021 1761 140.5 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +17 — +73 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.11
26 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.54 2022 1802 135.2 +1.22 +0.17 0.999 50.4% +25 — +9 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.92
27 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.50 2023 1779 141.0 +1.13 +0.49 1.024 50.6% +3 -119 +117 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.44
28 2017 1775 137.4 +0.83 +0.76 1.044 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.05 2024 1896 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -95 -87 +112 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.31
29 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.55 2025 1741 135.8 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +7 +22 +152 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.04
30 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) — +0.27 2026 1760 136.0 +1.23 -0.64 0.982 49.6% -63 +65 +173 50.9% -0.05 4–7 (36%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.13
31 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) — +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 1731 134.5 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 1698 130.9 -0.71 -1.95 0.900 47.7% +2 -169 +59 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1858 134.3 -0.75 -0.60 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.62 — 1933 141.0 +0.84 +0.33 1.013 50.2% -15 -77 +80 50.6% +0.11 74–85 (47%) 59–75 (44%) 94.6 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.