H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 0-2
Lucie Safarova holds a 2–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2011 Copenhagen quarterfinal 4-6 6-0 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2011* | Copenhagen | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 4-6 6-0 7-6(5) | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Lucie Safarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |