H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Shuai Peng H2H: 2-1
Shuai Zhang holds a 2–1 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shuai Zhang leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2016 Tianjin third round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 40
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2016* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shuai Peng | (w/o) | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2016* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2013* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-3 6-3 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Shuai Peng | #820 | #14 | 2,825 | 1,890 | 300 | 258 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Shuai Peng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #518 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #80 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #55 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #46 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #72 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #17 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #40 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #21 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #84 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #27 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #125 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #109 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |