H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:33 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Vera Zvonareva H2H: 0-1
Vera Zvonareva holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Zvonareva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2015 Pattaya fourth round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2026 | Doha | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-3 6-3 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2015* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Vera Zvonareva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 |