H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sílvia Soler-Espinosa vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 0-1

Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Sílvia Soler-Espinosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2011 Acapulco round of 16 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sílvia Soler-Espinosa
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gisela Dulko #73 6-1 6-1 Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #180 Match data Feb 25, 2011* R16 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa #858 #54 1,157 1,641 56 103 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0
21 2009 0–3 0.0% #183 1,473 0 0 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2010 1–2 33.3% #167 1,470 0 0 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2
23 2011 4–6 40.0% #81 1,517 0 0 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3
24 2012 13–18 41.9% #83 1,572 0 0 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3
25 2013 12–20 37.5% #82 1,523 0 0 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3
26 2014 17–22 43.6% #66 1,565 0 0 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4
27 2015 3–14 17.6% #145 1,490 0 0 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4
28 2016 5–6 45.5% #128 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2017 1–7 12.5% #225 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2018 0–4 0.0% #190 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2019 0–1 0.0% #681 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Gisela Dulko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
21 2009 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2010 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 2 1 3 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2012 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2013 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2014 5 14 19 26.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1 7 8 12.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 46 63 27.0% 35 51 86 40.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 151/159 of Sílvia Soler-Espinosa's and 229/365 of Gisela Dulko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Gisela Dulko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/12 2.0 5.0 57.5% 58.5% 47.9% 57.1% 30.8% 54.0% 40.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 9/41 3.0 4.9 55.9% 67.7% 45.0% 46.7% 55.4% 58.0% 42.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/55 2.3 4.8 56.5% 59.6% 39.2% 49.8% 44.7% 50.9% 48.8%
21 2009 3/3 1.0 2.3 57.7% 63.9% 43.1% 66.6% 29.9% 55.2% 32.5% 2006 26/39 1.5 4.9 59.7% 59.1% 42.3% 49.9% 52.7% 52.2% 42.9%
22 2010 3/3 0.7 3.3 66.8% 46.4% 27.4% 30.6% 65.2% 40.1% 37.1% 2007 36/52 1.0 4.3 61.7% 58.4% 42.9% 47.3% 47.6% 52.4% 43.2%
23 2011 10/10 2.6 2.0 55.2% 62.7% 47.0% 55.4% 37.8% 55.6% 40.6% 2008 35/39 1.4 3.5 61.9% 59.3% 47.2% 48.7% 48.3% 54.7% 43.0%
24 2012 29/31 1.8 3.3 51.9% 63.3% 45.1% 43.9% 43.4% 54.2% 40.8% 2009 44/48 2.7 4.2 58.1% 66.0% 44.8% 56.5% 48.7% 56.8% 44.9%
25 2013 30/32 0.8 3.4 57.3% 59.2% 41.6% 48.3% 47.8% 52.1% 40.5% 2010 39/42 2.3 3.8 60.6% 60.6% 46.5% 50.4% 51.1% 55.0% 46.3%
26 2014 35/39 1.6 2.5 59.0% 61.7% 47.9% 47.6% 42.2% 56.5% 39.0% 2011 28/30 2.0 4.3 57.2% 65.6% 43.9% 55.2% 49.5% 56.4% 45.7%
27 2015 17/17 1.2 2.4 64.6% 55.0% 45.9% 46.8% 32.9% 51.7% 34.8% 2012 5/7 0.6 5.0 52.5% 48.8% 36.6% 30.4% 34.6% 43.0% 40.8%
28 2016 11/11 1.2 3.4 67.1% 59.9% 46.4% 55.7% 42.7% 55.3% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 8/8 1.1 2.6 64.9% 58.5% 39.6% 51.7% 42.9% 51.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 4/4 0.3 0.8 70.9% 40.3% 43.1% 33.2% 43.8% 41.3% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1/1 0.0 2.0 65.3% 66.0% 36.0% 57.1% 25.0% 55.6% 24.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 151/159 1.4 2.8 59.1% 59.7% 44.6% 48.0% 42.4% 53.5% 39.4% — 229/373 1.9 4.2 59.5% 61.5% 44.5% 50.8% 49.2% 54.5% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sílvia Soler-Espinosa Gisela Dulko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73
21 2009 1474 97.6 -0.70 -3.36 0.724 44.6% — +23 — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.17 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89
22 2010 1471 96.6 -2.24 -2.66 0.620 39.1% — +15 — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.03 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85
23 2011 1518 109.9 -0.01 -2.46 0.914 48.0% +49 -43 — 38.1% -1.00 1–0 2–0 — -0.29 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13
24 2012 1573 117.2 -1.21 -2.11 0.892 47.4% +4 -38 +30 40.8% -0.83 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 102.3 -0.33 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13
25 2013 1523 109.0 -2.93 -3.15 0.846 46.2% -34 +90 +22 34.8% -1.26 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 +0.11 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55
26 2014 1565 116.5 -0.09 -3.75 0.897 48.1% -110 +123 — 43.2% -0.42 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 101.5 +0.01 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48
27 2015 1490 104.4 -3.29 -3.97 0.720 44.0% -71 +85 — 21.9% -1.97 1–1 1–1 — -0.55 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18
28 2016 1488 100.9 -1.09 -0.42 0.981 49.4% — +107 — 46.2% -0.42 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1492 103.8 -0.97 -3.58 0.810 45.2% -129 +87 — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 2–4 (33%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1541 108.6 -2.90 -0.39 0.680 40.5% — +59 — 11.1% -3.11 0–1 — — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1545 99.9 -3.32 -2.04 0.553 41.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1642 111.6 -1.49 -2.87 0.847 46.6% -53 +63 +26 35.8% -1.06 22–19 (54%) 17–23 (43%) 102.3 -0.53 — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.