H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa vs Sesil Karatantcheva H2H: 2-0
Sílvia Soler-Espinosa holds a 2–0 lead over Sesil Karatantcheva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sílvia Soler-Espinosa won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 2-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | Sesil Karatantcheva | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2014* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 6-2 6-1 | Sesil Karatantcheva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sesil Karatantcheva | #1,329 | #35 | 919 | 1,727 | 50 | 75 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Sesil Karatantcheva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #133 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #140 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |