H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Simona Halep vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 0-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 1–0 lead over Simona Halep in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2011 Strasbourg third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2011* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-2 6-1 | Simona Halep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simona Halep | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |