H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Simona Halep vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 0-2
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 2–0 lead over Simona Halep in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2015 Roland Garros second round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 7-5 6-1 | Simona Halep | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Simona Halep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simona Halep | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |