H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:30 UTC
Simona Halep vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 1-1
Simona Halep and Petra Cetkovska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on clay, while Simona Halep leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Petra Cetkovska | 6-1 6-3 | Simona Halep | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2012* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Simona Halep | 6-2 6-4 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simona Halep | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |