H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Simona Halep vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-1
Simona Halep and Tamira Paszek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2013 Miami second round 6-1 6-7(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | 6-1 6-7(4) 7-5 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Mar 20, 2013* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard |
| Tamira Paszek | 0-6 6-4 7-5 | Simona Halep | Match data | Aug 3, 2011* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,119 | 446 | 198 | 69.3% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simona Halep | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,972 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 2,002 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 15 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,012 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,943 | 2 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,060 | 2 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 2,002 | 2 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 2,030 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,953 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,926 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |