H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Sloane Stephens vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-4
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–0 lead over Sloane Stephens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2015 Eastbourne semifinal 6-1 6-7(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2015* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2013 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 7-6(2) | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2013* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2012* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sloane Stephens | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |