H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sofia Arvidsson vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 0-1
Iveta Benesova holds a 1–0 lead over Sofia Arvidsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iveta Benesova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2008 Prague third round 6-3 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Iveta Benesova | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sofia Arvidsson | #320 | #29 | 1,380 | 1,775 | 113 | 154 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sofia Arvidsson | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #67 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #98 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #41 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |