H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Sorana Cirstea vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 1-6

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 6–1 lead over Sorana Cirstea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 5–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2017 Shenzhen fourth round 6-0 6-3.

ROU Age 36 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 6
7 main draw meetings
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 5, 2017* Shenzhen WTA 250 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #3 6-0 6-3 Sorana Cirstea #78 Match data
Feb 13, 2014* Doha WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 7-5 6-0 Sorana Cirstea #26 Match data
Mar 7, 2013* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 Sorana Cirstea #29 Match data
Mar 7, 2012* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #5 6-2 6-4 Sorana Cirstea #48 Match data
Aug 8, 2009* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Sorana Cirstea #28 7-6(4) 1-6 7-5 Agnieszka Radwanska #13 Match data
Jul 30, 2009* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #13 6-0 6-1 Sorana Cirstea #29 Match data
May 23, 2008* Istanbul WTA 500 R16 Clay Agnieszka Radwanska #15 6-0 6-0 Sorana Cirstea #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sorana Cirstea #17 #17 2,535 2,024 373 343 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sorana Cirstea Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #353 1,485 0 0
17 2007 8–6 57.1% #108 1,559 0 0 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2008 25–16 61.0% #36 1,752 0 1 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2009 21–24 46.7% #45 1,691 0 1 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2010 13–23 36.1% #93 1,573 0 1 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2011 13–16 44.8% #60 1,600 0 1 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2012 30–26 53.6% #27 1,690 0 1 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2013 33–26 55.9% #22 1,710 0 1 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2014 12–21 36.4% #94 1,593 0 1 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #242 1,540 0 1 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2016 10–12 45.5% #79 1,612 0 1 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2017 28–20 58.3% #37 1,727 0 1 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2018 13–20 39.4% #84 1,621 0 1 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2019 21–16 56.8% #74 1,650 0 1 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2020 4–8 33.3% #71 1,663 0 1
31 2021 25–18 58.1% #39 1,755 0 2
32 2022 22–20 52.4% #45 1,693 0 2
33 2023 24–21 53.3% #26 1,826 0 2
34 2024 12–16 42.9% #69 1,754 0 2
35 2025 28–18 60.9% #43 1,870 0 3
36 2026 30–11 73.2% #17 1,985 0 4