H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Sorana Cirstea vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 3-2

Sorana Cirstea holds a 3–2 lead over Alizé Cornet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sorana Cirstea leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2013 Washington quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sorana Cirstea
ROU Age 36 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Alizé Cornet
FRA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2016 Cincinnati WTA 1000 Q2 Q Hard Alizé Cornet #48 7-5 3-6 5-1 Sorana Cirstea #92 Match data
Jul 29, 2013 Washington WTA 250 QF Hard Alizé Cornet #31 7-6(5) 6-2 Sorana Cirstea #28 Match data
Sep 22, 2012* Guangzhou WTA 250 QF Hard Sorana Cirstea #30 6-4 6-3 Alizé Cornet #48 Match data
Aug 24, 2012* Dallas WTA 250 R16 Hard Sorana Cirstea #38 6-1 7-5 Alizé Cornet #49 Match data
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Sorana Cirstea #41 6-3 6-2 Alizé Cornet #21 Match data
Apr 18, 2008* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Alizé Cornet #40 6-1 7-5 Sorana Cirstea #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sorana Cirstea #17 #17 2,535 2,024 373 343 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 376 358 51.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sorana Cirstea Alizé Cornet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #353 1,485 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,510 0 0
17 2007 8–6 57.1% #108 1,559 0 0 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0
18 2008 25–16 61.0% #36 1,752 0 1 2008 34–21 61.8% #16 1,775 0 1
19 2009 21–24 46.7% #45 1,691 0 1 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,660 0 1
20 2010 13–23 36.1% #93 1,573 0 1 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1
21 2011 13–16 44.8% #60 1,600 0 1 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,560 0 1
22 2012 30–26 53.6% #27 1,690 0 1 2012 21–19 52.5% #44 1,637 0 2
23 2013 33–26 55.9% #22 1,710 0 1 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3
24 2014 12–21 36.4% #94 1,593 0 1 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,789 0 4
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #242 1,540 0 1 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,632 0 4
26 2016 10–12 45.5% #79 1,612 0 1 2016 20–19 51.3% #41 1,702 0 5
27 2017 28–20 58.3% #37 1,727 0 1 2017 23–22 51.1% #38 1,750 0 5
28 2018 13–20 39.4% #84 1,621 0 1 2018 22–23 48.9% #45 1,693 0 6
29 2019 21–16 56.8% #74 1,650 0 1 2019 25–22 53.2% #59 1,683 0 6
30 2020 4–8 33.3% #71 1,663 0 1 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,763 0 6
31 2021 25–18 58.1% #39 1,755 0 2 2021 24–23 51.1% #61 1,744 0 6
32 2022 22–20 52.4% #45 1,693 0 2 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,755 0 6
33 2023 24–21 53.3% #26 1,826 0 2 2023 15–19 44.1% #117 1,684 0 6
34 2024 12–16 42.9% #69 1,754 0 2 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,613 0 6
35 2025 28–18 60.9% #43 1,870 0 3 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,558 0 6
36 2026 30–11 73.2% #17 1,985 0 4 — — — — — — —