H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:15 UTC
Sorana Cirstea vs Danielle Lao
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Sorana Cirstea vs Danielle Lao.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 36
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | #17 | #17 | 2,535 | 2,024 | 373 | 343 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Danielle Lao | #1,235 | #152 | 378 | 1,552 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sorana Cirstea | Danielle Lao | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #45 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #60 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #22 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #314 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #227 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #84 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #74 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #26 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #69 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #43 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |