H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 10:32 UTC
Sorana Cirstea vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-0
Sorana Cirstea holds a 1–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sorana Cirstea leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sorana Cirstea won the 2018 Bucharest fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 36
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2018* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sorana Cirstea | 6-2 7-5 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | #17 | #17 | 2,535 | 2,024 | 373 | 343 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sorana Cirstea | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #45 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #60 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #22 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #84 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #74 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #26 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #69 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #43 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |