H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Sorana Cirstea vs Na Li H2H: 2-4

Na Li holds a 4–2 lead over Sorana Cirstea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sorana Cirstea won the 2013 Toronto semifinal 6-1 7-6(5).

ROU Age 36 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 2013 Toronto WTA 1000 SF Hard Sorana Cirstea #27 6-1 7-6(5) Na Li #5 Match data
Jan 20, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Na Li #6 6-4 6-1 Sorana Cirstea #29 Match data
Aug 16, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Na Li #9 6-3 4-6 6-3 Sorana Cirstea #41 Match data
Jun 29, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Sorana Cirstea #52 6-3 6-4 Na Li #11 Match data
May 29, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Na Li #7 6-2 6-1 Sorana Cirstea #43 Match data
May 28, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Na Li #7 6-2 6-2 Sorana Cirstea #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sorana Cirstea #17 #17 2,535 2,024 373 343 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sorana Cirstea Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #353 1,485 0 0
17 2007 8–6 57.1% #108 1,559 0 0
18 2008 25–16 61.0% #36 1,752 0 1 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2009 21–24 46.7% #45 1,691 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2010 13–23 36.1% #93 1,573 0 1
21 2011 13–16 44.8% #60 1,600 0 1
22 2012 30–26 53.6% #27 1,690 0 1 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2013 33–26 55.9% #22 1,710 0 1 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2014 12–21 36.4% #94 1,593 0 1 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #242 1,540 0 1 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2016 10–12 45.5% #79 1,612 0 1 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2017 28–20 58.3% #37 1,727 0 1 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2018 13–20 39.4% #84 1,621 0 1 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2019 21–16 56.8% #74 1,650 0 1 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2020 4–8 33.3% #71 1,663 0 1 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2021 25–18 58.1% #39 1,755 0 2 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2022 22–20 52.4% #45 1,693 0 2 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
33 2023 24–21 53.3% #26 1,826 0 2
34 2024 12–16 42.9% #69 1,754 0 2
35 2025 28–18 60.9% #43 1,870 0 3
36 2026 30–11 73.2% #17 1,985 0 4