H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sorana Cirstea vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 1-4

Victoria Azarenka holds a 4–1 lead over Sorana Cirstea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2021 Montreal third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sorana Cirstea
ROU Age 36 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2021* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #15 6-2 6-2 Sorana Cirstea #40 Match data
Jul 1, 2021* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Sorana Cirstea #45 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #14 Match data
Jun 28, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Victoria Azarenka #8 7-6(2) 6-3 Sorana Cirstea #27 Match data
Jun 26, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Victoria Azarenka #16 6-1 6-3 Sorana Cirstea #66 Match data
May 28, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Victoria Azarenka #17 6-0 6-0 Sorana Cirstea #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sorana Cirstea #17 #17 2,535 2,024 373 343 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sorana Cirstea Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #353 1,485 0 0 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 8–6 57.1% #108 1,559 0 0 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 2008 25–16 61.0% #36 1,752 0 1 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 2009 21–24 46.7% #45 1,691 0 1 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3
20 2010 13–23 36.1% #93 1,573 0 1 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5
21 2011 13–16 44.8% #60 1,600 0 1 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8
22 2012 30–26 53.6% #27 1,690 0 1 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14
23 2013 33–26 55.9% #22 1,710 0 1 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17
24 2014 12–21 36.4% #94 1,593 0 1 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #242 1,540 0 1 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17
26 2016 10–12 45.5% #79 1,612 0 1 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2017 28–20 58.3% #37 1,727 0 1 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2018 13–20 39.4% #84 1,621 0 1 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2019 21–16 56.8% #74 1,650 0 1 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2020 4–8 33.3% #71 1,663 0 1 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2021 25–18 58.1% #39 1,755 0 2 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2022 22–20 52.4% #45 1,693 0 2 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2023 24–21 53.3% #26 1,826 0 2 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 12–16 42.9% #69 1,754 0 2 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 28–18 60.9% #43 1,870 0 3 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21
36 2026 30–11 73.2% #17 1,985 0 4 — — — — — — —