H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Stefanie Voegele vs Galina Voskoboeva H2H: 0-1
Galina Voskoboeva holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Galina Voskoboeva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Galina Voskoboeva won the 2014 Paris third round 5-7 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2014* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Galina Voskoboeva | 5-7 7-5 7-6(3) | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Galina Voskoboeva | #1,417 | #42 | 1,284 | 1,701 | 70 | 120 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefanie Voegele | Galina Voskoboeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #140 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #113 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #114 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #133 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #106 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #58 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #259 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #421 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |