H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Stefanie Voegele vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 0-2

Marina Erakovic holds a 2–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2013 Memphis semifinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stefanie Voegele
Switzerland Age 36 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marina Erakovic #71 6-2 6-4 Stefanie Voegele #89 Match data Feb 23, 2013* SF Memphis International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Marina Erakovic #58 6-3 6-4 Stefanie Voegele #126 Match data Feb 16, 2012* R32 Bogotá Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stefanie Voegele #1,075 #42 1,255 1,700 100 173 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefanie Voegele Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #124 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 10–9 52.6% #75 1,559 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2010 9–22 29.0% #135 1,504 0 0 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #138 1,518 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2012 2–7 22.2% #92 1,498 0 0 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2013 21–20 51.2% #50 1,664 0 0 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2014 14–23 37.8% #79 1,544 0 0 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2015 7–17 29.2% #119 1,510 0 0 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1
26 2016 10–14 41.7% #114 1,517 0 0 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2017 5–4 55.6% #169 1,650 0 0 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2018 9–17 34.6% #83 1,594 0 0 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2019 6–15 28.6% #119 1,594 0 0 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2020 1–5 16.7% #116 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2021 4–12 25.0% #147 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 1–5 16.7% #260 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stefanie Voegele Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2013 13 13 26 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2015 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2016 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2019 4 10 14 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 106 172 38.4% 29 48 77 37.7% 4 17 21 19.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 262/273 of Stefanie Voegele's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stefanie Voegele Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 5.0 60.0% 55.1% 33.6% 16.3% 35.9% 46.4% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 19/19 2.7 3.2 55.6% 66.8% 41.1% 47.3% 48.0% 55.2% 43.4% 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 2010 30/31 2.8 2.4 56.1% 60.6% 44.0% 42.9% 45.1% 53.4% 42.3% 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 2011 2/2 3.5 2.5 58.4% 56.9% 43.4% 50.0% 34.7% 51.7% 40.6% 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2012 8/9 2.5 4.1 53.6% 59.9% 42.3% 48.9% 33.7% 51.9% 41.9% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2013 40/41 3.5 2.7 54.9% 66.3% 46.8% 48.5% 40.8% 57.6% 41.9% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2014 36/37 4.4 1.9 56.4% 64.9% 42.8% 47.4% 49.5% 55.2% 42.3% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2015 17/24 3.1 2.3 60.4% 60.0% 45.8% 54.8% 47.5% 54.2% 37.1% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2016 24/24 2.6 1.8 56.8% 61.1% 42.5% 48.6% 43.8% 53.2% 42.7% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2017 9/9 3.9 3.0 55.5% 63.6% 42.5% 53.3% 44.0% 54.3% 42.0% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2018 26/26 3.3 1.9 56.8% 64.0% 47.0% 49.9% 36.3% 56.4% 38.5% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2019 21/21 2.2 2.8 56.8% 62.3% 40.6% 44.6% 46.9% 53.0% 41.5% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2020 6/6 2.0 3.0 53.4% 63.9% 39.8% 43.6% 31.9% 52.8% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 16/16 2.4 2.8 56.4% 59.0% 42.2% 53.8% 40.4% 51.7% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 6/6 0.8 3.7 51.6% 51.5% 31.0% 44.0% 48.0% 42.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 262/273 3.0 2.5 56.2% 62.8% 43.4% 47.9% 43.5% 54.3% 41.4% — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stefanie Voegele Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
18 2008 1486 102.6 +0.81 +2.45 0.828 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–0 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1559 110.5 -1.00 -0.45 0.970 48.9% -15 — +110 44.4% -0.20 7–0 (100%) 0–3 (0%) 107.0 +1.19 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.10
20 2010 1504 114.4 -2.38 -0.92 0.908 47.8% +41 -52 — 37.7% -0.88 1–8 (11%) 4–5 (44%) 92.7 +0.26 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2011 1518 101.1 -0.37 -0.64 0.842 46.1% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — -0.21 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 2012 1498 112.2 -1.83 -0.15 0.870 46.8% -12 +15 — 31.8% -1.23 1–3 (25%) — — -0.33 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 — +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 2013 1665 132.8 +0.93 -1.21 0.988 49.8% -31 -48 -123 46.9% -0.05 14–4 (78%) 5–8 (38%) 112.4 -0.72 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.24
24 2014 1544 116.4 -1.15 -1.36 0.944 48.6% +18 +54 — 43.7% -0.69 3–12 (20%) 6–6 (50%) 91.8 +0.91 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2015 1511 109.4 -3.15 -3.22 0.811 46.1% +55 +2 — 30.2% -1.26 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.11 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2016 1517 103.6 -2.18 -1.45 0.912 48.0% +27 +22 -70 42.0% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +1.52 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2017 1651 123.2 -0.54 +0.06 0.918 48.3% +32 — — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 1–0 — +0.12 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2018 1594 119.0 +0.12 -3.10 0.884 47.4% +36 -67 -143 39.3% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 -1.04 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2019 1594 116.8 -2.79 -1.89 0.882 47.2% +41 -76 — 34.8% -1.02 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.2 -0.08 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2020 1602 112.7 -0.73 -1.09 0.854 46.6% +29 — — 28.6% -1.57 0–2 1–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1538 111.9 -2.04 -1.43 0.834 46.0% +15 -4 — 28.9% -1.40 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1498 106.8 -4.32 -2.01 0.701 41.9% +78 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 — — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1700 120.1 -1.29 -1.46 0.904 47.8% +20 -14 -33 39.1% -0.79 41–51 (45%) 24–37 (39%) 96.3 +0.64 — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.