H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Stefanie Voegele vs Mihaela Buzarnescu H2H: 0-1
Mihaela Buzarnescu holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mihaela Buzarnescu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mihaela Buzarnescu won the 2019 Lausanne third round 1-6 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2019* | Lausanne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mihaela Buzarnescu | 1-6 6-1 6-0 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,872 | 58 | 63 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefanie Voegele | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #24 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #404 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |