H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Suzan Lamens vs Varvara Lepchenko
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Suzan Lamens vs Varvara Lepchenko.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 27
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suzan Lamens | #147 | #57 | 1,087 | 1,752 | 30 | 36 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Varvara Lepchenko | #172 | #19 | 1,875 | 1,804 | 155 | 220 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Suzan Lamens | Varvara Lepchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #132 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #200 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #102 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #74 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #54 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #47 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #90 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #129 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #127 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |