H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Alicia Molik H2H: 3-1

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 3–1 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2004 Rome second round 6-2 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 2004* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #14 6-2 4-6 6-4 Alicia Molik #39 Match data
Mar 13, 2004* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #14 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 Alicia Molik #33 Match data
Oct 4, 2002* Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Alicia Molik #89 7-6(3) 6-2 Svetlana Kuznetsova #45 Match data
Sep 26, 2002* Bali WTA 250 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #59 6-2 6-4 Alicia Molik #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,035 151 161 48.4% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Alicia Molik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2000 6–10 37.5% #115 1,552 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2004 37–18 67.3% #13 1,938 0 4
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,779 0 5
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,632 0 5
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,628 0 5
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2008 1–5 16.7% #308 1,577 0 5
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 — — — — — — —
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,561 0 5
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,584 0 5
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 — — — — — — —
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —