H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Alona Bondarenko H2H: 2-3

Alona Bondarenko holds a 3–2 lead over Svetlana Kuznetsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 3–0 on clay, while Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2009 Beijing fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Alona Bondarenko
UKR Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 6-3 4-6 6-0 Alona Bondarenko #37 Match data
May 14, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Alona Bondarenko #46 6-3 6-2 Svetlana Kuznetsova #7 Match data
Jan 24, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 7-6(7) 6-4 Alona Bondarenko #34 Match data
May 9, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Alona Bondarenko #25 1-6 6-2 6-2 Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 Match data
May 5, 2007* Warsaw WTA 500 SF Clay Alona Bondarenko #40 6-2 7-6(4) Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Alona Bondarenko #1,151 #19 2,020 1,872 154 143 51.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Alona Bondarenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2003 0–2 0.0% #187 1,472 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2004 1–1 50.0% #110 1,482 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2005 13–16 44.8% #79 1,528 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2006 24–22 52.2% #32 1,689 0 1
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2007 33–24 57.9% #21 1,765 0 1
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2008 25–20 55.6% #33 1,785 0 1
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2009 30–25 54.5% #32 1,781 0 1
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2010 24–19 55.8% #36 1,732 0 2
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2011 4–14 22.2% #257 1,565 0 2
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 — — — — — — —
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 — — — — — — —
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 — — — — — — —
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 — — — — — — —
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 — — — — — — —
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —