H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 4-4

Svetlana Kuznetsova and Amélie Mauresmo are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 New Haven quarterfinal 7-6(9) 2-6 6-3.

RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2009* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #18 7-6(9) 2-6 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 Match data
Mar 1, 2008* Dubai WTA 500 QF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #3 6-1 7-6(4) Amélie Mauresmo #29 Match data
Sep 24, 2006* Beijing WTA 500 F Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 6-4 6-0 Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
Mar 25, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 SF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #14 6-1 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
Feb 25, 2006* Dubai WTA 500 QF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #15 7-6(11) 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #2 Match data
Nov 10, 2004 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-3 6-2 Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 Match data
Oct 9, 2004* Filderstadt WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #1 7-5 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 Match data
May 8, 2004* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18