H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 5-0

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 5–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2010 Dubai third round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 18, 2010* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 (w/o) Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 Match data
Oct 8, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 6-2 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #22 Match data
Sep 2, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 6-3 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data
Apr 7, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #10 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #26 Match data
Aug 15, 2005 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 2-6 7-5 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —