H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 3-1

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 3–1 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–0 on clay, while Anna Smashnova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2006 Rome third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2006* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #10 6-1 6-3 Anna Smashnova #45 Match data
Apr 29, 2005* Warsaw WTA 500 R16 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #7 6-2 4-6 6-0 Anna Smashnova #35 Match data
Jul 23, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #9 6-3 6-0 Anna Smashnova #17 Match data
Oct 3, 2003* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Anna Smashnova #21 7-6(5) 6-0 Svetlana Kuznetsova #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,882 242 221 52.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Anna Smashnova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,599 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,574 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,560 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 — — — — — — —
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,582 0 0
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,637 0 1
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,668 0 2
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,793 0 6
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,857 0 8
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2004 28–23 54.9% #32 1,732 0 9
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,745 0 11
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,700 0 12
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,648 0 12
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 — — — — — — —
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —