H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 2-1

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 2–1 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2011 Sydney third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 13, 2011* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #25 6-2 6-2 Jelena Dokic #130 Match data
Aug 7, 2003* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #26 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Jelena Dokic #15 Match data
Mar 21, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Jelena Dokic #9 7-6(3) 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Jelena Dokic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 — — — — — — —
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 — — — — — — —
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 — — — — — — —
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —