H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Jie Zheng H2H: 7-1

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 7–1 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 6–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2013 Madrid second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #40 6-2 6-3 Jie Zheng #50 Match data
Jan 7, 2012* Auckland WTA 250 SF Hard Jie Zheng #48 2-6 6-3 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #19 Match data
Aug 21, 2010* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #16 6-1 6-3 Jie Zheng #24 Match data
Oct 7, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 7-6(3) 7-5 Jie Zheng #31 Match data
Aug 27, 2009* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 Jie Zheng #22 Match data
Jan 27, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 4-1 (ret.) Jie Zheng #24 Match data
Sep 27, 2008* Beijing WTA 500 SF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #7 7-6(3) 7-5 Jie Zheng #30 Match data
Mar 2, 2006* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #14 6-0 6-1 Jie Zheng #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Jie Zheng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —