H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 2-3

Lindsay Davenport holds a 3–2 lead over Svetlana Kuznetsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2006 Bali semifinal 7-6(4) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 16, 2006* Bali WTA 500 SF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Lindsay Davenport #12 Match data
Jan 24, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-2 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #11 Match data
Jun 30, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Lindsay Davenport #1 7-6(1) 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 Match data
Feb 6, 2005* Tokyo WTA 1000 SF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #1 6-1 7-6(2) Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 Match data
Sep 11, 2004* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #9 1-6 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —