H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 3-0

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 3–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2013 Miami first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 2013* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #45 6-3 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #56 Match data
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #75 6-2 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #46 Match data
Apr 14, 2006* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #10 6-2 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —