H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 6-2

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 6–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 3–2 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2013 Madrid third round 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4.

RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #40 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #11 Match data
Jan 26, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #19 6-3 3-6 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #3 Match data
Oct 10, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 SF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 6-1 6-3 Nadia Petrova #17 Match data
May 31, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 6-2 6-1 Nadia Petrova #25 Match data
May 12, 2007* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 7-6(5) 6-4 Nadia Petrova #9 Match data
Oct 7, 2006* Stuttgart WTA 500 SF Hard Nadia Petrova #7 6-2 1-6 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 Match data
Sep 18, 2004* Bali WTA 250 SF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 6-7(1) 6-1 6-2 Nadia Petrova #13 Match data
Sep 9, 2004* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #9 7-6(4) 6-3 Nadia Petrova #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18