H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Shahar Peer H2H: 4-4

Svetlana Kuznetsova and Shahar Peer are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2011 Doha third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Shahar Peer
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 2011* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Shahar Peer #12 6-2 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #13 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Shahar Peer #22 6-3 2-6 6-0 Svetlana Kuznetsova #7 Match data
Sep 6, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #6 7-5 6-1 Shahar Peer #64 Match data
Mar 28, 2008* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 7-6(4) 6-3 Shahar Peer #19 Match data
Jan 11, 2008* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #2 6-3 6-4 Shahar Peer #17 Match data
Jun 4, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #3 6-4 6-3 Shahar Peer #17 Match data
Mar 23, 2007* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Shahar Peer #16 6-4 4-6 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #3 Match data
Jan 23, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Shahar Peer #17 6-4 6-2 Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 — — — — — — —
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 — — — — — — —
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 — — — — — — —
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —