H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 4-1

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 4–1 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2008 Doha fourth round 6-3 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sybille Bammer #19 6-3 7-6(8) Svetlana Kuznetsova #2 Match data
Oct 19, 2007* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #2 2-6 6-4 7-5 Sybille Bammer #21 Match data
May 10, 2007* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 6-1 7-5 Sybille Bammer #25 Match data
Mar 10, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #4 6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 Sybille Bammer #46 Match data
May 12, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #10 6-2 6-4 Sybille Bammer #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,844 130 139 48.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 — — — — — — —
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 — — — — — — —
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 — — — — — — —
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,492 0 0
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,569 0 0
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,780 0 1
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2008 24–24 50.0% #26 1,682 0 1
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,662 0 2
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,646 0 2
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,569 0 2
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —