H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-1
Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 2–1 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2016 Auckland fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 6-2 6-3 | Svetlana Kuznetsova | Match data | Jan 8, 2016* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Mar 25, 2009* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6-3 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Jul 3, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | #1,203 | #2 | 6,191 | 2,098 | 585 | 322 | 64.5% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 18 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Svetlana Kuznetsova | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2001 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #266 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2002 | 22–9 | 71.0% | #43 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2003 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,031 | 1 | 5 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2005 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #18 | 1,871 | 1 | 5 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 61–20 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,043 | 1 | 8 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2007 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #2 | 1,998 | 1 | 9 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2008 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #8 | 1,928 | 1 | 9 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,988 | 2 | 12 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2010 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #27 | 1,885 | 2 | 13 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,804 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,776 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,826 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,845 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,842 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,916 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #12 | 1,827 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,710 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,772 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #36 | 1,788 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #109 | 1,720 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |