H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Vania King H2H: 2-0
Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 2–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2014 Washington quarterfinal RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2014 | Washington | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Svetlana Kuznetsova | RET | Vania King | Match data |
| May 28, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6-4 6-2 | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | #1,203 | #2 | 6,191 | 2,097 | 580 | 319 | 64.5% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 18 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Svetlana Kuznetsova | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #266 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 22–9 | 71.0% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2003 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,026 | 1 | 5 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #18 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 61–20 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,039 | 1 | 8 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #2 | 1,994 | 1 | 9 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,934 | 1 | 9 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,981 | 2 | 12 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #27 | 1,884 | 2 | 13 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,804 | 2 | 13 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,776 | 2 | 13 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,827 | 2 | 13 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,845 | 2 | 14 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,836 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,917 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #12 | 1,826 | 2 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,709 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #53 | 1,772 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #36 | 1,799 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #109 | 1,726 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |