H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Tamara Korpatsch vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 1-1
Tamara Korpatsch and Stefanie Voegele are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tamara Korpatsch won the 2018 Gstaad third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2018* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tamara Korpatsch | 6-2 6-0 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2018* | Lugano | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Stefanie Voegele | 6-4 6-3 | Tamara Korpatsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Korpatsch | #75 | #71 | 951 | 1,731 | 46 | 72 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Korpatsch | Stefanie Voegele | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #164 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #117 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #74 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |